Thursday, December 19, 2013

LAUC-B 2013 Conference "Making it Count" recorded sessions on YouTube

The LAUC-B Conference Planning Committee is pleased to announce that recorded sessions from the 2013 LAUC-B Conference, "Making it Count: Opportunities and Challenges for Library Assessment" are now available on YouTube. 


Recorded sessions include: 
1. Welcome Remarks, Tom Leonard, and Opening Keynote, Steve Hiller
2. Panel Discussion with Joanne Miller, Lyn Paleo, and Merrilee Proffitt 
3. Lightning Talks: Joe Cera, Stephanie Rosenblatt and April Cunningham, Lynn Jones and Susan Edwards, Adam Siegel
4. Breakout Session: Small Data Assessment and Action Research, Stephanie Rosenblatt and April Cunningham
5. Closing Keynote: "Empowerment Assessment," David Fetterman


It was a great conference - watch the videos!

Joint Statement on Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing

The Committee on Publication Ethics, the Directory of Open Access Journals, the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, and the World Association of Medical Editors are scholarly organizations that have seen an increase in the number of membership applications from both legitimate and non-legitimate publishers and journals. Our organizations have collaborated in an effort to identify principles of transparency and best practice that set apart legitimate journals and publishers from non-legitimate ones and to clarify that these principles form part of the criteria on which membership applications will be evaluated.

This is a work in progress and we welcome feedback on the general principles and the specific criteria. Please see the full statement on the OASPA blog (http://oaspa.org/blog/).

Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, OASPA
http://oaspa.org/

Friday, December 13, 2013

SCOAP3 Open Access Publishing Initiative to Go Live on 1 January 2014

SCOAP3 Open Access Publishing Initiative to Go Live on 1 January 2014

Thanks to the hard work and steadfast commitment of hundreds of libraries and individuals across the globe, SCOAP3, the Sponsoring Consortium for Open Access Publishing in Particle Physics, will soon become a reality.  This ground-breaking initiative will make a large proportion of the formal literature in high energy physics openly accessible worldwide, through direct financial support of the peer review and publication process by libraries and funding agencies who have agreed to become SCOAP3 Partners.  The initiative has its organizational home at CERN, the European Center for Nuclear Research located in Geneva, Switzerland.  Publishers participating in SCOAP3 whose HEP journals will be made open access include Elsevier, Hindawi, Institute of Physics, OUP, and Springer, among others.  A press release announcing the launch can be found on the SCOAP3 website at http://scoap3.org/news/news102.html

The UC Libraries have long supported this initiative and have recently confirmed participation in a formal memorandum of understanding (MOU) between CDL and CERN designating the University of California as a SCOAP3 Partner.  UC was the first institution in the U.S. to indicate its support for SCOAP3 through an Expression of Interest in 2008, and has continued to be an active champion as funding commitments were cultivated elsewhere in the US and around the world. 

SCOAP3 relies on a unique funding model which utilizes the redirection of library licensing fees to fund article processing charges in participating journals, without requiring payments from individual authors.  License fee reductions are in the process of being finalized with the relevant publishers so that these fees can be redirected to SCOAP3.   Participation fees are fixed for the initial three-year term of the project.

CDL’s Director of Collections Ivy Anderson has been involved with SCOAP3 throughout its formative stages as a member of the Steering Committee and chair of the Technical Working Group.  Anderson has recently been elected to the newly-formed Executive Committee of SCOAP3, which will oversee the operation and further development of the initiative, including the SCOAP3 repository being established at CERN. 

n addition to serving as an archival and access repository for the articles funded by SCOAP3, participating institutions will be able to obtain a feed of SCOAP3 papers authored at their institutions for ingestion into institutional repositories.  A list of U.S. members to date can be found on the SCOAP-USA website at http://www.lyrasis.org/scoap3usa

CDL has been privileged to help to bring SCOAP3 to birth, and looks forward to assisting in its further development and engaging other stakeholders in the UC library and physics communities.   Please feel free to contact Ivy Anderson <ivy.anderson@ucop.edu> for more information. 

Friday, December 6, 2013

OCLC Research Report on Reserach Data Management Policies

Starting the Conversation: University-wide Research Data Management Policy

An OCLC Research Report by:

Ricky Erway, OCLC Research


Starting the Conversation: University-wide Research Data Management Policy is a call for action that summarizes the benefits of systemic data management planning and identifies the stakeholders and their concerns. It also suggests that the library proactively initiate a conversation among these stakeholders to get buy-in for a high-level, responsible data planning and management policy that is proactive, rather than reactive, and is also supported and sustainable.

Suggested citation:
Erway, Ricky. 2013. Starting the Conversation: University-wide Research Data Management Policy. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Research. http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2013/2013-08.pdf.

Friday, August 2, 2013

Announcement: University of California Faculty Senate Passes Open Access Policy

Subject: University of California Faculty Senate Passes Open Access Policy
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 17:27:36 +0000            http://senate.universityofcalifornia.edu

Senate Approves Open Access Policy

The Academic Senate of the University of California has passed an Open Access Policy, ensuring that future research articles authored by faculty at all 10 campuses of UC will be made available to the public at no charge. “The Academic Council’s adoption of this policy on July 24, 2013, came after a six-year process culminating in two years of formal review and revision,” said Robert Powell, chair of the Academic Council. “Council’s intent is to make these articles widely—and freely— available in order to advance research everywhere.”  Articles will be available to the public without charge via eScholarship (UC’s open access repository) in tandem with their publication in scholarly journals.  Open access benefits researchers, educational institutions, businesses, research funders and the public by accelerating the pace of research, discovery and innovation and contributing to the mission of advancing knowledge and encouraging new ideas and services.

Chris Kelty, Associate Professor of Information Studies, UCLA, and chair of the UC University Committee on Library and Scholarly Communication (UCOLASC), explains, “This policy will cover more faculty and more research than ever before, and it sends a powerful message that faculty want open access and they want it on terms that benefit the public and the future of research.”

The policy covers more than 8,000 UC faculty at all 10 campuses of the University of California, and as many as 40,000 publications a year.  It follows more than 175 other universities who have adopted similar so-called “green” open access policies.  By granting a license to the University of California prior to any contractual arrangement with publishers, faculty members can now make their research widely and publicly available, re-use it for various purposes, or modify it for future research publications.  Previously, publishers had sole control of the distribution of these articles.  All research publications covered by the policy will continue to be subjected to rigorous peer review; they will still appear in the most prestigious journals across all fields; and they will continue to meet UC’s standards of high quality.  Learn more about the policy and its implementation here: http://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/openaccesspolicy/
UC is the largest public research university in the world and its faculty members receive roughly 8% of all research funding in the U.S.  With this policy UC Faculty make a commitment to the public accessibility of research, especially, but not only, research paid for with public funding by the people of California and the United States.  This initiative is in line with the recently announced White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) directive requiring “each Federal Agency with over $100 million in annual conduct of research and development expenditures to develop a plan to support increased public access to results of the research funded by the Federal Government.” The new UC Policy also follows a similar policy passed in 2012 by the Academic Senate at the University of California, San Francisco, which is a health sciences campus.

"The UC Systemwide adoption of an Open Access (OA) Policy represents a major leap forward for the global OA movement and a well-deserved return to taxpayers who will now finally be able to see first-hand the published byproducts of their deeply appreciated investments in research” said Richard A. Schneider, Professor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and chair of the Committee on Library and Scholarly Communication at UCSF.   “The ten UC campuses generate around 2-3% of all the peer-reviewed articles published in the world every year, and this policy will make many of those articles freely  available to anyone who is interested anywhere, whether they are colleagues, students, or members of the general public."

The adoption of this policy across the UC system also signals to scholarly publishers that open access, in terms defined by faculty and not by publishers, must be part of any future scholarly publishing system.  The faculty remains committed to working with publishers to transform the publishing landscape in ways that are sustainable and beneficial to both the University and the public.  

**********************************************************************************
The new Open Access Policy page on the Reshaping Scholarly Communication (http://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/openaccesspolicy/) website provides links to:

·         OA Policy approved by the Academic Senate
·         FAQ
·         Press Release
·         Waiver/embargo/addendum letter generator
·         Chris Kelty’s video interview

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Working Paper on Copyright for Books and Music - Paul Heald - Illinois Program in Law, Behavior and Social Science

Heald, Paul J., How Copyright Makes Books and Music Disappear (and How Secondary Liability Rules Help Resurrect Old Songs) (July 5, 2013). Illinois Program in Law, Behavior and Social Science Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2290181

  Abstract:     
A random sample of new books for sale on Amazon.com shows more books for sale from the 1880’s than the 1980’s. Why? This paper presents new data on how copyright seems to make works disappear. First, a random sample of 2300 new books for sale on Amazon.com is analyzed along with a random sample of 2000 songs available on new DVD’s. Copyright status correlates highly with absence from the Amazon shelf. Together with publishing business models, copyright law seems to stifle distribution and access. Second, the availability on YouTube of songs that reached number one on the U.S., French, and Brazilian pop charts from 1930-60 is analyzed in terms of the identity of the uploader, type of upload, number of views, date of upload, and monetization status. An analysis of the data demonstrates that the DMCA safe harbor system as applied to YouTube helps maintain some level of access to old songs by allowing those possessing copies (primarily infringers) to communicate relatively costlessly with copyright owners to satisfy the market of potential listeners.


Comment included in The Atlantic Monthly article
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/07/the-hole-in-our-collective-memory-how-copyright-made-mid-century-books-vanish/278209/

Thursday, June 13, 2013

New selection criteria for DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals

The Directory of Open Access Journals (www.doaj.org) is delighted to announce new selection criteria and *hereby announces that these new criteria are open for public comment until July 15th*.

The DOAJ-team has developed the criteria and our Advisory Board has provided input and comments.

With the growth in the number of research funders, institutional open access policies and mandates, all stakeholders involved – researchers (as authors and readers), research managers, staff managing publication funds, librarians, universities and research funders - need a trusted and reliable information resource that identifies good quality open access journals and filters out disreputable publishers. Equally, the former have a vested interest in not being associated with the latter.

We have tried to construct objective criteria that can facilitate compliance verification easily. In order to be listed in the DOAJ, a journal must meet the following criteria:
  • Journal will be asked to provide basic information (title, ISSN, etc.), contact information, and information about journal policies
  • Journal is registered with SHERPA/RoMEO
  • Journal has an editorial board with clearly identifiable members (including affiliation information)
  • Journal publishes a minimum of five articles per year (does not apply for new journals)
  • Allows use and reuse at least at the following levels (as specified in the Open Access Spectrum, http://www.plos.org/about/open-access/howopenisit/):
    • Full text, metadata, and citations of articles can be crawled and accessed with permission (Machine Readability Level 4)
    • Provides free readership rights to all articles immediately upon publication (Reader Rights Level 1)
    • Reuse is subject to certain restrictions; no remixing (Reuse Rights Level 3)
    • Allow authors to retain copyright in their article with no restrictions (Copyrights Level 1)
    • Author can post the final, peer-reviewed manuscript version (postprint) to any repository or website (Author Posting Rights Level 2)
You may review the complete list of criteria 

Future submissions for inclusion in to DOAJ must include the complete set of information provided by the publisher. This information will be publicly available in the Directory. The journals currently listed in the DOAJ will have to go through a re-evaluation process based on the new criteria. This work will take place over the next 12 months or so.

*DOAJ Seal of Approval*
At the same time we are launching the DOAJ Seal of Approval for Open Access Journals (in short: the DOAJ Seal) to encourage a high practice standard. These journals will be identified with the DOAJ Seal logo.

In addition to the more general criteria, above, required for inclusion in the DOAJ, the following criteria must be met for a journal to receive the DOAJ Seal:
  • Provides machine readable copyright information to help search engines identify open works
  • Provides DOIs at the article level
  • Provides metadata to DOAJ at the article level
  • Has a digital archiving/preservation arrangement in place
  • Allows use and reuse at least at the following levels (as specified in the Open Access Spectrum, http://www.plos.org/about/open-access/howopenisit/):
    • Allows a community standard API or other protocol to crawl or access full text, metadata, citations, and data (including supplementary data) for articles (Open Access Spectrum: Machine Readability Level 2)
    • Ensures generous reuse and remixing rights (Open Access Spectrum: Reuse Rights Level 1)
    • Allows authors to post any version of their article to any repository or website (Open Access Spectrum: Author Posting Rights Level 1)
+++++++++++++++++++++
We are confident that the new criteria will positively contribute to the transparency of open access. Since open access journals are a relatively new phenomenon, and one that is continuously changing, we will probably have to revise the criteria to keep them current and up to date.

To avoid any misunderstanding, we are restating DOAJ's scope here:

  • The DOAJ has the ambition to continue to be the white list of open access journals that are global in scope in terms of geography, scientific discipline and language.
  • In scope: Journals that provide immediate access to scholarly articles without reader payment, including back-files from those journals made freely available after transitioning to open access.

Not in scope:

  • Single articles from subscription based journals made freely available under an open access option (hybrid articles).
  • Articles from subscription based journals made freely available after an embargo period (so-called delayed open access – not a term in our dictionary).

Your comments on the new criteria are much appreciated and will contribute toward their implementation. Comments must be received before 6pm CEST on Monday 15th July 2013 and should be sent to the DOAJ Community Manager Dominic Mitchell (dom@doaj.org).

Kind regards

Lars Bjørnshauge Managing Director, DOAJ