Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Does your library need a digital humanities center? Essay from OCLC Research

Digital Humanities: Options for research libraries covered in new essay


The digital humanities (DH) are attracting considerable attention and funding at the same time that this nascent field strives for an identity. Some research libraries are committing significant resources to creating DH centers. But questions about whether such an investment is warranted persist across the cultural heritage community. More »

Friday, February 7, 2014

Mythbuster: U.S. Digital dissertations not required for Library of Congress under Mandatory Deposit rules

[Reprinted from posting to ETD-L discussion group on January 31, 2014]

The question of mandatory deposit for U.S. dissertations seems to cause confusion because there are various myths percolating about (1) whether dissertations MUST go to the Library of Congress to comply with the Mandatory Deposit rule in US Copyright law and (2) How to get dissertations to the Library of Congress. With the aim of dispelling myths, an analysis of the question was posted to this blog at http://sites.tdl.org/fuse/?cat=13.

The upshot is that the all-digital dissertations do not need to go to the Library of Congress at this time. That is because their rules specifically exempt dissertations that exist only in digital format.
<more>

Thursday, December 19, 2013

LAUC-B 2013 Conference "Making it Count" recorded sessions on YouTube

The LAUC-B Conference Planning Committee is pleased to announce that recorded sessions from the 2013 LAUC-B Conference, "Making it Count: Opportunities and Challenges for Library Assessment" are now available on YouTube. 


Recorded sessions include: 
1. Welcome Remarks, Tom Leonard, and Opening Keynote, Steve Hiller
2. Panel Discussion with Joanne Miller, Lyn Paleo, and Merrilee Proffitt 
3. Lightning Talks: Joe Cera, Stephanie Rosenblatt and April Cunningham, Lynn Jones and Susan Edwards, Adam Siegel
4. Breakout Session: Small Data Assessment and Action Research, Stephanie Rosenblatt and April Cunningham
5. Closing Keynote: "Empowerment Assessment," David Fetterman


It was a great conference - watch the videos!

Joint Statement on Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing

The Committee on Publication Ethics, the Directory of Open Access Journals, the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, and the World Association of Medical Editors are scholarly organizations that have seen an increase in the number of membership applications from both legitimate and non-legitimate publishers and journals. Our organizations have collaborated in an effort to identify principles of transparency and best practice that set apart legitimate journals and publishers from non-legitimate ones and to clarify that these principles form part of the criteria on which membership applications will be evaluated.

This is a work in progress and we welcome feedback on the general principles and the specific criteria. Please see the full statement on the OASPA blog (http://oaspa.org/blog/).

Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, OASPA
http://oaspa.org/

Friday, December 13, 2013

SCOAP3 Open Access Publishing Initiative to Go Live on 1 January 2014

SCOAP3 Open Access Publishing Initiative to Go Live on 1 January 2014

Thanks to the hard work and steadfast commitment of hundreds of libraries and individuals across the globe, SCOAP3, the Sponsoring Consortium for Open Access Publishing in Particle Physics, will soon become a reality.  This ground-breaking initiative will make a large proportion of the formal literature in high energy physics openly accessible worldwide, through direct financial support of the peer review and publication process by libraries and funding agencies who have agreed to become SCOAP3 Partners.  The initiative has its organizational home at CERN, the European Center for Nuclear Research located in Geneva, Switzerland.  Publishers participating in SCOAP3 whose HEP journals will be made open access include Elsevier, Hindawi, Institute of Physics, OUP, and Springer, among others.  A press release announcing the launch can be found on the SCOAP3 website at http://scoap3.org/news/news102.html. 

The UC Libraries have long supported this initiative and have recently confirmed participation in a formal memorandum of understanding (MOU) between CDL and CERN designating the University of California as a SCOAP3 Partner.  UC was the first institution in the U.S. to indicate its support for SCOAP3 through an Expression of Interest in 2008, and has continued to be an active champion as funding commitments were cultivated elsewhere in the US and around the world. 

SCOAP3 relies on a unique funding model which utilizes the redirection of library licensing fees to fund article processing charges in participating journals, without requiring payments from individual authors.  License fee reductions are in the process of being finalized with the relevant publishers so that these fees can be redirected to SCOAP3.   Participation fees are fixed for the initial three-year term of the project.

CDL’s Director of Collections Ivy Anderson has been involved with SCOAP3 throughout its formative stages as a member of the Steering Committee and chair of the Technical Working Group.  Anderson has recently been elected to the newly-formed Executive Committee of SCOAP3, which will oversee the operation and further development of the initiative, including the SCOAP3 repository being established at CERN. 

n addition to serving as an archival and access repository for the articles funded by SCOAP3, participating institutions will be able to obtain a feed of SCOAP3 papers authored at their institutions for ingestion into institutional repositories.  A list of U.S. members to date can be found on the SCOAP-USA website at http://www.lyrasis.org/scoap3usa. 

CDL has been privileged to help to bring SCOAP3 to birth, and looks forward to assisting in its further development and engaging other stakeholders in the UC library and physics communities.   Please feel free to contact Ivy Anderson <ivy.anderson@ucop.edu> for more information. 

Friday, December 6, 2013

OCLC Research Report on Reserach Data Management Policies

Starting the Conversation: University-wide Research Data Management Policy

An OCLC Research Report by:

Ricky Erway, OCLC Research


Starting the Conversation: University-wide Research Data Management Policy is a call for action that summarizes the benefits of systemic data management planning and identifies the stakeholders and their concerns. It also suggests that the library proactively initiate a conversation among these stakeholders to get buy-in for a high-level, responsible data planning and management policy that is proactive, rather than reactive, and is also supported and sustainable.

Suggested citation:
Erway, Ricky. 2013. Starting the Conversation: University-wide Research Data Management Policy. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Research. http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2013/2013-08.pdf.

Friday, August 2, 2013

Announcement: University of California Faculty Senate Passes Open Access Policy

Subject: University of California Faculty Senate Passes Open Access Policy
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 17:27:36 +0000            http://senate.universityofcalifornia.edu

Senate Approves Open Access Policy

The Academic Senate of the University of California has passed an Open Access Policy, ensuring that future research articles authored by faculty at all 10 campuses of UC will be made available to the public at no charge. “The Academic Council’s adoption of this policy on July 24, 2013, came after a six-year process culminating in two years of formal review and revision,” said Robert Powell, chair of the Academic Council. “Council’s intent is to make these articles widely—and freely— available in order to advance research everywhere.”  Articles will be available to the public without charge via eScholarship (UC’s open access repository) in tandem with their publication in scholarly journals.  Open access benefits researchers, educational institutions, businesses, research funders and the public by accelerating the pace of research, discovery and innovation and contributing to the mission of advancing knowledge and encouraging new ideas and services.

Chris Kelty, Associate Professor of Information Studies, UCLA, and chair of the UC University Committee on Library and Scholarly Communication (UCOLASC), explains, “This policy will cover more faculty and more research than ever before, and it sends a powerful message that faculty want open access and they want it on terms that benefit the public and the future of research.”

The policy covers more than 8,000 UC faculty at all 10 campuses of the University of California, and as many as 40,000 publications a year.  It follows more than 175 other universities who have adopted similar so-called “green” open access policies.  By granting a license to the University of California prior to any contractual arrangement with publishers, faculty members can now make their research widely and publicly available, re-use it for various purposes, or modify it for future research publications.  Previously, publishers had sole control of the distribution of these articles.  All research publications covered by the policy will continue to be subjected to rigorous peer review; they will still appear in the most prestigious journals across all fields; and they will continue to meet UC’s standards of high quality.  Learn more about the policy and its implementation here: http://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/openaccesspolicy/
UC is the largest public research university in the world and its faculty members receive roughly 8% of all research funding in the U.S.  With this policy UC Faculty make a commitment to the public accessibility of research, especially, but not only, research paid for with public funding by the people of California and the United States.  This initiative is in line with the recently announced White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) directive requiring “each Federal Agency with over $100 million in annual conduct of research and development expenditures to develop a plan to support increased public access to results of the research funded by the Federal Government.” The new UC Policy also follows a similar policy passed in 2012 by the Academic Senate at the University of California, San Francisco, which is a health sciences campus.

"The UC Systemwide adoption of an Open Access (OA) Policy represents a major leap forward for the global OA movement and a well-deserved return to taxpayers who will now finally be able to see first-hand the published byproducts of their deeply appreciated investments in research” said Richard A. Schneider, Professor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and chair of the Committee on Library and Scholarly Communication at UCSF.   “The ten UC campuses generate around 2-3% of all the peer-reviewed articles published in the world every year, and this policy will make many of those articles freely  available to anyone who is interested anywhere, whether they are colleagues, students, or members of the general public."

The adoption of this policy across the UC system also signals to scholarly publishers that open access, in terms defined by faculty and not by publishers, must be part of any future scholarly publishing system.  The faculty remains committed to working with publishers to transform the publishing landscape in ways that are sustainable and beneficial to both the University and the public.  

**********************************************************************************
The new Open Access Policy page on the Reshaping Scholarly Communication (http://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/openaccesspolicy/) website provides links to:

·         OA Policy approved by the Academic Senate
·         FAQ
·         Press Release
·         Waiver/embargo/addendum letter generator
·         Chris Kelty’s video interview